Most Economics EEs evaluate a policy that already happened. But what if your topic is a scheme that was only piloted, or proposed and then deferred, so there is barely any public data? A forward-looking policy topic can absolutely work, and it can mirror IB's own sample research question.
It can follow the shape of IB's sample RQ
IB's sample Economics RQ analyses how valid an economic argument is in light of current research. A forward-looking policy analysis fits the same shape: you take a core theory, anchor it to a specific place, and test it against the evidence you can gather.
The three components to check
- 1A core economic theory (for a congestion charge, that is negative externalities)
- 2A specific geographic place (for example, Hong Kong)
- 3Empirical research on the specific scheme (pilot data, government reports, and your own primary surveys where public data is thin)
Add a comparison to push it further
IB's sample does not just present one argument. It compares an argument against current research and then runs its own analysis to reach a conclusion. You can do the same: instead of only presenting your argument, weigh it against your own primary data. Think "argument A versus my own study, therefore this conclusion." That comparative move is what lifts it.
Key Takeaways
- Forward-looking and proposed-policy topics are valid for an Economics EE
- Anchor it in a core theory, a specific place, and real empirical research
- Primary surveys are fine where public data is thin
- Compare your argument against your own study rather than just presenting it
Free guide
See strong Economics structure and frameworks for a top-band essay.